A federal judge ruled that New Jersey’s consumer fraud lawsuit against Discord Inc. does not present a substantial federal question, remanding the case to state court.
Illinois citizens cannot sue Amazon and Pindrop under the state’s biometric privacy law for voiceprint authentication services used on calls routed through Virginia servers.
A federal judge in Seattle ruled that a direct-to-consumer retailer provided reasonably conspicuous notice of its arbitration terms through its online checkout screens, staying a putative class action alleging deceptive email marketing pending arbitration.
WILMINGTON (LN) — A magistrate judge denied FCA US LLC’s request to postpone class certification briefing until after ruling on the automaker’s pending motion for summary judgment, finding that the precedent FCA cited does not support deferral before a...
A federal judge in the Western District of Washington denied a motion for spoliation sanctions against Amazon, ruling that the company’s duty to preserve electronically stored information covered underlying data and code, not static snapshots of product...
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has reached a settlement with LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. that prohibits the company from using Automated Content Recognition technology to collect viewing data without consumers' informed consent.
A federal judge dismissed a class action against Saatva, ruling that its website claims did not violate a California labeling law and that the plaintiff failed to prove imported parts exceeded a 5 percent safe harbor.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Netflix on Monday, alleging the streaming service illegally collected and sold users’ personal data without consent, violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
A federal judge in New York denied Bayer’s attempt to decertify a class action alleging the company’s gummy vitamins deceptively implied a one-pill daily serving size.
Connecticut secured a settlement with an international trade platform to stop the sale of unapproved GLP-1 weight loss drugs to U.S. consumers.
A California consumer says the infomercial giant ran a perpetual "76% OFF" sale on its website that was never actually a sale.
Three consumers who say a frozen-fish manufacturer added a chemical preservative and water to its fillets — then labeled them "100% Whole Fish Fillets" — get to press their case.
A Kentucky federal judge ordered plaintiffs' lawyers to address a key Sixth Circuit ruling on commonality — even after being told to do so once before.
New York's attorney general settled with the cryptocurrency platform after it marketed a product backed by risky micro-loans to video game players in China as a reliable savings vehicle.
A San Diego federal judge found that Ashlynn Marketing Group deleted its kratom-product blog during active litigation and then watched Wayback Machine archives prove it.
A Chicago woman whose discharged debts kept showing up as past due on her credit report can still pursue one theory against Experian — just not the one that would have required the agency to comb through bankruptcy dockets.
A Utah man testified that debt-collection letters sent without required federal disclosures caused him extreme stress and panic, triggered suicidal thoughts, and strained his family relationships.
A company that told federal regulators it knew of only two fire incidents had actually logged at least 16 — and kept selling the units anyway.
A Colorado federal judge let most claims stand against a fertility provider hit by a ransomware gang that published patients' intimate reproductive records on the dark web, but only one plaintiff's out-of-pocket monitoring costs cleared the injury bar for...
Judge Jon S. Tigar granted California’s motion to remand a consumer protection and public nuisance suit against major food manufacturers, holding that the state—not San Francisco—is the real party in interest for diversity jurisdiction purposes.